feasibility001020.gif
Marianas Feasibility Study
evaluating the feasibility of a slaughterhouse/meat business
Home
Project components
About the project
Links
Contact
feasibility011023.gif
feasibility011021.gif
feasibility011019.gif
feasibility011017.gif
feasibility011015.gif
livestock
markets
regulatory
economics
management
feasibility011013.gif
feasibility011011.gif
feasibility011009.gif
feasibility011007.gif
feasibility011005.gif
feasibility011003.gif
processing
environmental
logistical
financial
business
overview
feasibility011002.gif
regulatory

Regulatory & permitting considerations

 

Regulatory and permitting considerations

·        Applicable rules, regulations, and application processes

·         Permitting considerations

·        Mobile Processing Units

·         Additional information

                                                      

1.      Applicable rules, regulations, and application processes: 

·        Before the facility can begin operation under USDA inspection, three written plans must be prepared (and approved by USDA):

§         SOP - Standard Operating Procedures (e.g., for Special Risk Materials).

§        SSOP - Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (e.g., for facility cleaning activities).

§        HAACP- Hazard Analysis Critical Cotrol Point (a food safety program; pronounced "ha-sip").

·        USDA’s inspection activities (from http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-1950/ANSI-3972web.pdf)

§        “Inspection begins with the review of the plans for a slaughtering or processing plant. Plans for the facilities, equipment and procedures must be approved to insure that the plant will have a safe and sanitary operation. The floor plans, water supply, waste disposal system, lighting, and other parts of the plant must be approved either by the state inspection technical services office or the USDA Meat Inspection Office.

§         The inspector conducts a pre-op inspection of the plant and equipment before operations begin each day and continues this inspection throughout the day to see that sanitary conditions are maintained. The inspector has the authority to stop the plant operation any time unsanitary conditions arise in a processing operation.

§        Inspection also checks the animals before slaughter to be sure they are not diseased. Any animal appearing sick undergoes a special examination. No dead or dying animal can be brought into a slaughtering plant. After slaughter, each carcass and the internal organs are examined for signs of disease or contamination that would make all or part of the carcass unfit as human food. In addition, government inspectors regularly send tissue samples to their laboratories to determine the presences of illegal drug and chemical residues. If illegal amounts of toxic residues are detected, the meat from that carcass is not permitted to enter the meat distribution system, but will go to inedible rendering.”

·         Applying for a federal Grant of Inspection for Meat and for Inspection for Meat and Poultry Establishments: 

§         An overview of the steps required for obtaining federal meat inspection is available at:  http://www.fsis.usda.gov/PPT/Applying_for_Grant_of_Inspection.ppt

§        Guam and CNMI fall under the jurisdiction of the Food Safety and Inspection Service regional office in Denver, CO: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Contact_Us/Office_Locations_&_Phone_Numbers/index.asp

§        However, the primary point of contact for Guam/CNMI is Joseph Realdine, the regional inspector based in Hawaii.  Contact Mr. Realdine at: joseph.realdine@fsis.usda.gov

·         An example of a SOP for Special Risk Materials (SRM) is available at: http://foodsafety.unl.edu/haccp/sop/BSE%20Slaughter%20SOP%20and%20Log.pdf

·        An example of a SSOP plan and sanitation control records is available at:  http://nsgd.gso.uri.edu/flsgp/flsgpe00001/flsgpe00001_part7.pdf

·        A Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point System (HACCP) plan must be developed and used by all USDA-inspected slaughter facilities, including small (less than 500 employees) and very small (less than 10 employees) operations.  Refer to: http://www.meathaccp.wisc.edu/Model_Haccp_Plans/assets/pork/checklist_Slaughter.pdf andhttp://www.fsis.usda.gov/Science/hazard_analysis_&_pathogen_reduction/index.asp

A Generic HACCP Model for Pork Slaughter

·        The Animal Health Protection and Disease Control Act was enacted in 1984 for the protection of animal and human health in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Public Law 4-55.  http://www.cnmilaw.org/pdf/public_laws/04/pl04-55.pdf

·        Special Help from USDA for Small and Very Small Processing Plants

§         As defined in the 1996 Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) regulations, "small" slaughter establishments have between 10 and 499 employees. "Very small" slaughter establishments have fewer than 10 employees or less than $2.5 million in annual sales.

§        More than 90% of the 6,000 plants inspected by USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) are small or very small. FSIS provides a special website to help operators of small and very small meat, poultry and processed egg product facilities: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Small_Very_Small_Plants/

·        The role of USDA’s meat inspectors is described in this 4-page overview of “Meat Inspection and Grading” from Oklahoma State University:http://pods.dasnr.okstate.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-1950/ANSI-3972web.pdf

·        The inspection and grading of meat and poultry are two separate programs within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Inspection for wholesomeness is mandatory and is paid for out of tax dollars. Grading for quality is voluntary, and the service is requested and paid for by meat and poultry producers/processors.  http://www.fsis.usda.gov/factsheets/inspection_&_grading/index.asp

 

2.     Permitting considerations 

·         In addition to applicable permits for the slaughterhouse operation, permits will be required for confined animal feeding operations providing livestock for the meat business. 

·        An overview of permitting requirements by CNMI DEQ can be found at: http://www.deq.gov.mp/article.aspx?secID=6&artID=32 ; relevant excerpts from the home page include:

§         “This branch also responsible in reducing the direct and indirect discharge of untreated animal waste to state water and groundwater through use of components and practices (such as septic tanks, leach field, waste storage ponds, waste utilization, composting or other methods). A confined animal facility is a lot or facility (other than an aquatic animal production facility) where the following conditions are met:

·        Animals (other than aquatic animals) have been, are, or will be stabled or confined and fed or maintained for a total of 45 days or more in any 12-month period, and

·         Crops, vegetation forage growth, or post-harvest residues are not sustained in the normal growing season over any portion of the lot or facility.

§        Facilities are requested to construct and operate an Other Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) if they contain any of the following number of head:

·         15 or more pigs

·        20 or more goats

·         10 or more cattle

·        100 or more chickens

·         OR, any confined animal facility which had been found by the Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to have caused, by evidence of direct or indirect discharge, in violation of the CNMI Water Quality Standards or CNMI Drinking Water Regulations.

§         Large confined animal facilities (more than 100 heads of pigs, 1000 chickens, or 50 cattle) may be required to meet more stringent requirements which is determined on a case-by-case basis. Runoff includes any precipitation (rain or snow) that comes into contact with any manure, litter, or bedding. Facility wastewater is water discharged in the operation of an animal facility as a result of any or all of the following: animal or poultry watering; washing, cleaning, or flushing pens, barns, manure pits, or other animal facilities; washing or spray cooling of animals; and dust control.”

 

3.      Mobile Slaughtering Units

  • Pre-fabricated mobile slaughtering units (MSUs) represent a possible slaughterhouse option for the Marianas.  

§         Mobile slaughtering / processing units in use at several locations in the U.S. are designed and pre-fabricated to meet USDA FSIS requirements. 

§         Some of the mobile operations include on-going FSIS inspections, so the meat products can be sold into commercial markets.

 

4.     Additional information: 

·         Local Meat Processing information

§        A compilation of information regarding small meat processing facilities by ATTRA, the National Sustainable Agricultural Information Service:

§         http://attra.ncat.org/newsletter/attranews_0910.html#story3

·        Legal Issues for Poultry Processors

§         “Federal and State Inspection Requirements for On-Farm Poultry Production and Processing”, by Dr Janie Hipp; December 2001; http://www.apppa.org/legalintro.pdf

§        Even though this article is focused on poultry, the report has relevance to small-scale red meat production in the Marianas.

·        “Overview of Aquaculture Environmental Permitting Issues in CNMI”

§         prepared by the Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture, Hawaii, with relevance to  small-scale red meat production:

§        http://www.ctsa.org/upload/publication/CNMI_Permitting_Overview632080439187139874.pdf

 

 

feasibility011001.gif